Skip to main content

Manhatta

Directors: Charles Sheeler and Paul Strand
Year: 1921
Runtime: 10 min
Source: Youtube

The ten-minute art piece Manhatta, conceived by two photographers Charles Sheeler and Paul Strand is occasionally called cinema's first avant-garde film, and is somehow both more conventional, and more extreme, than that description denotes.

To start with, Manhatta is not about rejecting the status quo, but celebrating it, in this case the apotheosis of the industrial era that was Manhattan after the turn of the century.  We see stunning shots of a city-scape that is both familiar and strange, unmistakably New York despite missing most of the landmarks we would recognize (with the exception of the Brooklyn Bridge, which has never looked so stunning outside Woody Allen's own ode to the city).  These shots are paired with words from Walt Whitman's poem about the city - the passages chosen here center around man's mastering of the environment, and implicitly, his own destiny.

On the other hand, a modern viewing can't help but see this version of the city as an anachronistic dystopia.  I'm not sure there's any scene from Metropolis or Modern Times that quite rivals the image of an approaching Staten Island Ferry packed to the gills with identically-clad businessmen, who pour out of the boat in a rush that is just less than frantic.  Or the shot of men in black and white suits walking in a graveyard with black and white tombstones.  Or a harbor filled with giant steam cruisers, seen from the tops of skyscrapers themselves belching out steam.  It's impossible for a man of my time to look on this all and not see a society on the edge of a cliff.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Big Sleep

Director: Howard Hawks Year: 1946 While  The Maltese Falcon cares deeply about its plot, which ends up pretty simple if very well-paced, The Big Sleep  revels in its complexity, is extremely difficult to follow, even if it ultimately cares much more about its characters than most "puzzle films". This film clearly had a big influence on  Inherent Vice. I'm not sure I love it - my wife got so confused she couldn't keep watching - but I think there's certainly a lot more to it than most of the noirs we've seen so far. Bacall is excellent, and Bogart is just perfect. I would certainly watch it again to see how it holds up now that I have a better idea of what's going on.

The Docks of New York

Director: Josef von Sternberg Year: 1928 Run-time: 1 hr 16 min Source: Youtube Silent films were certainly on their way out in 1928, at least if you were an American studio director who's not Chaplin or Keaton, and this was one of those little gems that went largely unseen due to that transition.  It feels a bit like both a proto-noir and a proto-gangster film, but neither of those labels quite fit.  It's actually an effective, unconventional romance film, something that starts out cynical but ends up very sweet. I enjoyed the film more than I thought I would, but with this entry in the list, I can't help but notice the big American studio system of the mid-century is falling into place, with Keaton now making films like The Cameraman  for MGM (a studio which would ultimately ruin his career), and this film released by the newly renamed Paramount Pictures.  Along with it, the rough edges are getting smoothed down a little bit.  Certainly, the standards in...

Le Quai des brumes (Port Of Shadows)

Director: Marcel Carné Year: 1938 Run-time: 1 hr 31 min - This is the first of two Carné films on the list from 1938.  We haven't talked much about French poetic realism, the style pioneered by Pepe le Moko  (also starring Jean Gabin), but this is where that style heavily overlaps with what would become film noir (Wikipedia claims this was one of the first films to be called as such).  The tropes of noir are so heavily associated with post-war depression and malaise that it's pretty shocking to see these same tropes show up before the war - the French government agreed, and even banned this film for a time as not representative of the French spirit.  It's an excellent film, though. From my perspective, both of these early Carné works show clear ties to the Marseilles trilogy - this one, because of the persistent theme of the sea as a place for escape and loss of identity. - I am much more in love with the French acting style of the 30's than I am...