Skip to main content

A Dog's Life

Director: Charlie Chaplin
Year: 1918
Runtime: 33 minutes
Source: Youtube

Though it may come before his greatest and most well-known works, A Dog's Life shouldn't really be considered an "early" Charlie Chaplin film.  By 1918, Chaplin was a massive celebrity, one of the highest-paid men in the world, and his character "The Tramp" was already a global icon.  But it is clear from this film that Chaplin was only just beginning to push his character beyond pure vaudeville slapstick.

A Dog's Life is a breezy delight from beginning to end - there are plenty of great set-pieces.  The dog is plenty cute, although she doesn't actually play a huge role in what plot there is, or even in the best comedy bits.  Of course I'm just guessing here, but it's easy to imagine that Chaplin with his notorious perfectionism was immensely frustrated while dealing with a canine costar, and chose to limit her involvement.  In any case, Chaplin is more than capable of sustaining this movie himself with his wonderful demeanor and expressions, although kudos to the wonderful side characters that populate this film.  There are many films that better illustrate the way that Chaplin reflects class dynamics, but you don't have to be a Chaplin scholar (I'm certainly not one) to see how all these conniving thieves, hapless hobos, and oblivious aristocrats must have been a Chaplin cliche by this point (perhaps a Chaplin Cinematic Universe?)

As a physical comedian, Chaplin doesn't hold a candle to Buster Keaton in my book, but there's a wonderful pacing and energy to these scenes, and I can appreciate the tremendous craft it took to construct them.  The best thing I can say about A Dog's Life is that it just feels immune to deep critical analysis.  It's a fun comedy and I'm glad to have watched it.  There's a great version on Youtube, so like so many other early films on this list - no reason not to check it out.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fétiche Mascotte (The Mascot)

Director: Ladislas Starevich Year: 1933 Run-time: 26 min Source: Youtube Notable For : The second animated short on the list from 1933 is this stop-motion piece from the Polish-Russian film-maker Ladislas Starevich.  Stop-motion is almost as old as cinema itself (Starevich had been innovating since 1912).  The craft here is as good as any modern film, and Starevich's twisted imagination is on full display, with dolls and household objects coming to life in a dark version of Toy Story.  For animation fans, it almost goes without saying that Starevich was an influence on Jan Svankmajer's work much later. Verdict :  Every frame is a bizarre delight. There didn't seem to be an overarching plan to this work (indeed, it's possible that The Mascot  is an amalgamation of several shorter films featuring the same dog character), and so the film veers from one strange scene to the next, with much of the second half taking place in some kind of tchotchke hell governe...

A Trip to the Moon

Director: Georges Méliès Year: 1902 Seeing the painstakingly restored hand-colored print of A Trip to the Moon, in a literally mind-numbing 14 frames per second, makes it utterly clear that cinema is and has always been witchcraft. Every frame of this short feels bursting with magic, and even watching it on a modern TV in a space age that would have blown the mind of any of the actors of this film, you're left thinking "How did they do that?".

Paisan

Director: Roberto Rossellini Year: 1946 The greatest innovation in cinema around this period is the emergence of mainstream films that are anchored so specifically in contemporary life, that were deliberately not timeless. Rossellini went further than anyone else in this direction - Paisan  deliberately interweaves stock war footage with staged settings, real actors with non-professionals, to create something that deliberately skirts the line between fiction and documentary. Paisan  is also the first great bilingual film on the list, not only featuring English and Italian but many different dialects, making the film extremely difficult for a native Italian to understand. The performances are often extremely stilted, and there are glaring editing mistakes, but many of the stories are extremely compelling.