Skip to main content

Бронено́сец Потёмкин (Battleship Potemkin)

Director: Sergei Eisenstein
Year: 1925
Run-time: 75 min
Source: Kanopy

This film's reputation puts at on a higher level than the prior films on this list, and there's certainly not much I can add to that reputation.  I'm just going to say what strikes me about it at the moment, in the context of the other films I've been watching.

Battleship Potemkin is a Soviet propaganda film conceived as such: it documents and celebrates a very specific event in Russian history on its twentieth anniversary, the mutiny of the ship Potemkin and its participation in the riots in the city of Odessa.  (Wisely, Eisenstein scrapped the original plan of covering the entire first Russian revolution.)  Certainly, the story fits the needs of the state, although the basic facts are accurate.  The famous Odessa Steps sequence really took place at night and not on the steps themselves, but Tsarist soldiers really did fire on the protesting crowds, and the resulting panic would not need much dramatization.

As I've mentioned before, the silent era gave directors more control over their films than they could ever have with sound.  Battleship Potemkin came along at the perfect time to make a propaganda film, when a message could be so precisely controlled.  But although Eisenstein doesn't shy away from intertitles, he uses them much more effectively, and the images themselves convey much more.  Unlike with Intolerance, Eisenstein's presence is not foregrounded, and the themes feel much more organic and less heavy-handed.

So far, I think all of this sounds quite dry, but Battleship Potemkin is absolutely worth watching, and you may find yourself surprised at how moving it is (especially when presented well, as with Kino's restoration).  One can make the claim that Potemkin, rather than Nosferatu, should be considered the first great horror thriller.  It's certainly much more capable of evoking the right tension - certainly, I can't watch the Odessa Steps sequence without feeling the panic.  In its sense of melodrama, and pretty much nothing else, it is something of an inheritor of the prior Russian cinema seen in Yevgeni Bauer's films.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bringing Up Baby

Director: Howard Hawks Year: 1938 Run-time: 1 hr 42 min - Bringing Up Baby  is in my mind the epitome of the screwball comedy, and probably its finest example.  Hepburn and Grant are just so perfect in their roles, and the level of constant absurdity gets to the point where it overrides any cultural datedness and just becomes fun.  (The main exception is the Irish stereotype, but given that he is justified in how he behaves, it's excusable.)  I was a bit shocked to discover that this was not a commercial success, and indeed almost ruined Hepburn's career (she had the most to lose, given how novel her quirky performance is). - Looking back at the three screwballs so far on this list, it never occurred to me before how the genre seems to rely on a rich and "privileged" female lead to be the one to challenge and emasculate the male lead.  Perhaps that was the acceptable way to present it to a depression-era audience?

The Cat Concerto

Directors: William Hanna and Joseph Barbera Year: 1947 I'm sure it's no coincidence that music plays such a strong role in many of the animated films featured on the list. By this point, there's nothing especially novel about this Tom and Jerry  short by another great animation studio led by Hanna and Barbera, except that the execution is so spot-on. This is eight minutes of pure delight. 

The Fall of the House of Usher

Director: James Sibley Watson and Melville Webber Year: 1928 Run-time: 13 min Source: Youtube In one of those strange cinematic coincidences, there were actually two adaptations of Poe's wonderful melancholic work, the short story The Fall of the House of Usher .  In France, Jean Epstein (featured on our list for Coeur Fidele ) partnered with a new-to-the-industry Luis Bunuel, putting out a critical success - Ebert, for example, ranks it among his favorite films. This is the other one.  Contrary to national stereotypes, the American director James Watson took a much more impressionistic and avant-garde approach to the source material.  Although the three characters are present, and a few of the key scenes are recognizable, anyone who hasn't read the (very short) tale will have a hard time following along.  The key takeaway from this highly experimental work is the overbearing sense of anxiety and fear that it imparts.  As with the last film, I watched it ...