Skip to main content

Manhatta

Directors: Charles Sheeler and Paul Strand
Year: 1921
Runtime: 10 min
Source: Youtube

The ten-minute art piece Manhatta, conceived by two photographers Charles Sheeler and Paul Strand is occasionally called cinema's first avant-garde film, and is somehow both more conventional, and more extreme, than that description denotes.

To start with, Manhatta is not about rejecting the status quo, but celebrating it, in this case the apotheosis of the industrial era that was Manhattan after the turn of the century.  We see stunning shots of a city-scape that is both familiar and strange, unmistakably New York despite missing most of the landmarks we would recognize (with the exception of the Brooklyn Bridge, which has never looked so stunning outside Woody Allen's own ode to the city).  These shots are paired with words from Walt Whitman's poem about the city - the passages chosen here center around man's mastering of the environment, and implicitly, his own destiny.

On the other hand, a modern viewing can't help but see this version of the city as an anachronistic dystopia.  I'm not sure there's any scene from Metropolis or Modern Times that quite rivals the image of an approaching Staten Island Ferry packed to the gills with identically-clad businessmen, who pour out of the boat in a rush that is just less than frantic.  Or the shot of men in black and white suits walking in a graveyard with black and white tombstones.  Or a harbor filled with giant steam cruisers, seen from the tops of skyscrapers themselves belching out steam.  It's impossible for a man of my time to look on this all and not see a society on the edge of a cliff.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bringing Up Baby

Director: Howard Hawks Year: 1938 Run-time: 1 hr 42 min - Bringing Up Baby  is in my mind the epitome of the screwball comedy, and probably its finest example.  Hepburn and Grant are just so perfect in their roles, and the level of constant absurdity gets to the point where it overrides any cultural datedness and just becomes fun.  (The main exception is the Irish stereotype, but given that he is justified in how he behaves, it's excusable.)  I was a bit shocked to discover that this was not a commercial success, and indeed almost ruined Hepburn's career (she had the most to lose, given how novel her quirky performance is). - Looking back at the three screwballs so far on this list, it never occurred to me before how the genre seems to rely on a rich and "privileged" female lead to be the one to challenge and emasculate the male lead.  Perhaps that was the acceptable way to present it to a depression-era audience?

Partie de campagne (A Day In the Country)

Director: Jean Renoir Year: 1936 Run-time: 40 min - You can tell that French film is thriving in 1936 by the fact that a film by Renoir is the worst of the last three on the list.  (Renoir has two 1936 films on the list - and other classics from this year that didn't make the cut.)  That's only really due to its brevity, and the fact that it wasn't properly finished due to extenuating circumstances.  What exists is still pretty excellent - putting the elegant but slight story aside, it's Renoir's ode to the natural world, which never quite came through before due to the bluntness of 1930's cinematography.  In fact, it's the only Renoir film I've seen in which he channels something of his father's eye for natural beauty (a fact he alludes to himself in a later commentary he gave on the film).

The Cat Concerto

Directors: William Hanna and Joseph Barbera Year: 1947 I'm sure it's no coincidence that music plays such a strong role in many of the animated films featured on the list. By this point, there's nothing especially novel about this Tom and Jerry  short by another great animation studio led by Hanna and Barbera, except that the execution is so spot-on. This is eight minutes of pure delight.