Skip to main content

The Kid

Director: Charlie Chaplin
Year: 1921
Runtime: 53 min
Source: Youtube

Surely this will be a sad cliche by the time I give up on this mad quest, but while watching Charlie Chaplin's The Kid, I couldn't help but think about superhero movies.  Specifically, the way that superhero movies once could be relied on to contain predictable and largely superfluous plots, and now, due to their massive popularity, they're trying to adapt themselves to a whole host of genres, from slapstick comedies to emotional dramas.

Somehow that's the best analogy for me to make sense of The Kid.  This was Charlie Chaplin's gambit, to adapt his vaudeville-rooted comedy, all based around his wildly successful Tramp character, to somehow fit into a tearjerker drama, which seems to be heavily influenced by D.W. Griffith (who Chaplin definitely admired and partnered with to create United Artists).  Chaplin adopted Griffith's penchant for nameless, archetypal characters (The Tramp is featured alongside The Woman and The Man), and The Kid's theme of scrappiness and self-reliance in the face of an uncaring bureaucratic system is certainly similar to that of Intolerance, although the political message here is subdued.

To give credit to Chaplin, who I've never been crazy about in the same way that I love Buster Keaton, the whole experiment really did turn out well.  The humor tempers what would otherwise be an intolerable melodrama.  The linchpin that keeps these disparate elements from flying apart is Chaplin's superb control of his expressions and mannerisms.  The Tramp character is nowhere close to faultless in this movie as he fathers an orphan child, but in his own absurd way, he lets out tiny hints that the character loves this boy.

It genuinely is a sweet film, and my only regret is that I didn't look more carefully for a better version of it.  If you're looking to see it, I would try to see the Criterion version if possible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fétiche Mascotte (The Mascot)

Director: Ladislas Starevich Year: 1933 Run-time: 26 min Source: Youtube Notable For : The second animated short on the list from 1933 is this stop-motion piece from the Polish-Russian film-maker Ladislas Starevich.  Stop-motion is almost as old as cinema itself (Starevich had been innovating since 1912).  The craft here is as good as any modern film, and Starevich's twisted imagination is on full display, with dolls and household objects coming to life in a dark version of Toy Story.  For animation fans, it almost goes without saying that Starevich was an influence on Jan Svankmajer's work much later. Verdict :  Every frame is a bizarre delight. There didn't seem to be an overarching plan to this work (indeed, it's possible that The Mascot  is an amalgamation of several shorter films featuring the same dog character), and so the film veers from one strange scene to the next, with much of the second half taking place in some kind of tchotchke hell governe...

A Trip to the Moon

Director: Georges Méliès Year: 1902 Seeing the painstakingly restored hand-colored print of A Trip to the Moon, in a literally mind-numbing 14 frames per second, makes it utterly clear that cinema is and has always been witchcraft. Every frame of this short feels bursting with magic, and even watching it on a modern TV in a space age that would have blown the mind of any of the actors of this film, you're left thinking "How did they do that?".

Paisan

Director: Roberto Rossellini Year: 1946 The greatest innovation in cinema around this period is the emergence of mainstream films that are anchored so specifically in contemporary life, that were deliberately not timeless. Rossellini went further than anyone else in this direction - Paisan  deliberately interweaves stock war footage with staged settings, real actors with non-professionals, to create something that deliberately skirts the line between fiction and documentary. Paisan  is also the first great bilingual film on the list, not only featuring English and Italian but many different dialects, making the film extremely difficult for a native Italian to understand. The performances are often extremely stilted, and there are glaring editing mistakes, but many of the stories are extremely compelling.