Skip to main content

The River

Director: Frank Borzage
Year: 1929
Run-time: 1 hour (reconstructed - much of the footage is missing)
Source: DVD from Edition Filmmuseum

Dan Sallitt's Excellent Analysis

Notable for:  There were three Frank Borzage movies released in just a couple months, with Lucky Star being the first, and The River being the last.  The River has the same male lead as Lucky Star, Charles Farrell, this time partnered with Mary Duncan (not an especially well-known actress, but as I learned somewhat surreptitiously, was the 1928 Round-up Queen in my hometown of Pendleton.)  It was a critical and commercial flop on account of its salaciousness.  It contained scenes that were more explicitly erotic than anything in the American cinema at the time, and was heavily censored in many theaters.

Verdict:  Although we only have an hour of reconstructed footage to work with, it is clear that this is very different from the prevous Borzage films on the list.  It has elements of the mythical or fable; as Sallitt proposes, this is Borzage channeling Murnau, although it's much more sexual than anything Murnau made.  As a romance, it's much more ambiguous and intriguing.  This is the first Borzage film to suggest that love might have a darker side. In its current state, I don't necessarily recommend that people go seeking this one out, but I am glad that I watched it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bringing Up Baby

Director: Howard Hawks Year: 1938 Run-time: 1 hr 42 min - Bringing Up Baby  is in my mind the epitome of the screwball comedy, and probably its finest example.  Hepburn and Grant are just so perfect in their roles, and the level of constant absurdity gets to the point where it overrides any cultural datedness and just becomes fun.  (The main exception is the Irish stereotype, but given that he is justified in how he behaves, it's excusable.)  I was a bit shocked to discover that this was not a commercial success, and indeed almost ruined Hepburn's career (she had the most to lose, given how novel her quirky performance is). - Looking back at the three screwballs so far on this list, it never occurred to me before how the genre seems to rely on a rich and "privileged" female lead to be the one to challenge and emasculate the male lead.  Perhaps that was the acceptable way to present it to a depression-era audience?

Partie de campagne (A Day In the Country)

Director: Jean Renoir Year: 1936 Run-time: 40 min - You can tell that French film is thriving in 1936 by the fact that a film by Renoir is the worst of the last three on the list.  (Renoir has two 1936 films on the list - and other classics from this year that didn't make the cut.)  That's only really due to its brevity, and the fact that it wasn't properly finished due to extenuating circumstances.  What exists is still pretty excellent - putting the elegant but slight story aside, it's Renoir's ode to the natural world, which never quite came through before due to the bluntness of 1930's cinematography.  In fact, it's the only Renoir film I've seen in which he channels something of his father's eye for natural beauty (a fact he alludes to himself in a later commentary he gave on the film).

The Cat Concerto

Directors: William Hanna and Joseph Barbera Year: 1947 I'm sure it's no coincidence that music plays such a strong role in many of the animated films featured on the list. By this point, there's nothing especially novel about this Tom and Jerry  short by another great animation studio led by Hanna and Barbera, except that the execution is so spot-on. This is eight minutes of pure delight.