Skip to main content

Frankenstein

Director: James Whale
Year: 1931
Run-time: 1 hr 11 min
Source: Amazon Video

Notable For: It's the most iconic adaptation of Mary Shelley's great novel (here she's unfortunately credited as Mrs. Percy Shelley) and the second and probably the most successful in Universal's series of monster movies from this period.  Boris Karloff's performance as the monster with a hint of humanity was compelling for audiences of the time, and the film was a huge commercial success.

Verdict:  It's not a bad film by any stretch, but it's not as interesting to me as Nosferatu before it, and not nearly as gripping as Shelley's novel.  One could say that there are "shades" to Karloff's character, but there are also silly artifices working against that notion, such as the scientist's use of a "criminal's brain".  A modern viewer isn't going to find much that's thrilling in Frankenstein - the most compelling aspect of the film to me is the set design, which borrows the style of German expressionism.  I'm a big fan of the castle at the beginning.  I also enjoyed Colin Clive's performance as the scientist who dares to match the abilities of God.  It's worth seeing for its many influences, but keep your expectations low.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Killers

  The Killers  uses up every noir cliche that had developed by this time - the detective story with flashbacks from Laura , the insurance investigator from Double Indemnity, the seductive femme fatale from Gilda - but somehow manages to feel wholly original. I thought that I'd grow weary of noirs by this point, but they are getting better, and there's no doubt that it's a fun genre, if there's not always much going under the pristine surface. There's some tremendous acting, and I unabashedly love the opening scene with the titular killers - the only part that seems to have been actually adapted from the Hemingway short story (Ernest himself was nevertheless a fan) - but the ending doesn't really work. It's a bit easier to follow than The Big Sleep, but it has a few too many twists for what is ultimately a pretty straightforward story without any real morals. Still, I have to recommend it, and it would definitely be up there in my list of best noirs.
Post a Comment
Read more

Fétiche Mascotte (The Mascot)

Director: Ladislas Starevich Year: 1933 Run-time: 26 min Source: Youtube Notable For : The second animated short on the list from 1933 is this stop-motion piece from the Polish-Russian film-maker Ladislas Starevich.  Stop-motion is almost as old as cinema itself (Starevich had been innovating since 1912).  The craft here is as good as any modern film, and Starevich's twisted imagination is on full display, with dolls and household objects coming to life in a dark version of Toy Story.  For animation fans, it almost goes without saying that Starevich was an influence on Jan Svankmajer's work much later. Verdict :  Every frame is a bizarre delight. There didn't seem to be an overarching plan to this work (indeed, it's possible that The Mascot  is an amalgamation of several shorter films featuring the same dog character), and so the film veers from one strange scene to the next, with much of the second half taking place in some kind of tchotchke hell governe...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Trip to the Moon

Director: Georges Méliès Year: 1902 Seeing the painstakingly restored hand-colored print of A Trip to the Moon, in a literally mind-numbing 14 frames per second, makes it utterly clear that cinema is and has always been witchcraft. Every frame of this short feels bursting with magic, and even watching it on a modern TV in a space age that would have blown the mind of any of the actors of this film, you're left thinking "How did they do that?".
Post a Comment
Read more