Skip to main content

M

Director: Fritz Lang
Year: 1931
Source: Criterion Channel Streaming

Wikipedia

Analysis from One Hundred Years of Cinema

Roger Ebert's Review

Notable For:  This is Lang's first sound film and one that he would later call his magnum opus.  The depiction of a serial killer is surprisingly nuanced for the era.  The film is frank about the terror his actions cause but at least tries to understand his compulsions, and directly questions the audience on whether it's right to kill someone who can't control himself.  There are a number of classic scenes here - certainly Lang's editing and use of montage were in top form here.

Verdict:  Although it doesn't displace Metropolis in my mind, it's definitely a masterpiece.  In addition to everything laid out previously, I find it effective as an attempt at greater realism in crime fiction, in comparison to Fantomas or even Lang's earlier film Spies (although the more outlandish depiction of organized crime contradicts that somewhat).  The film does do its best to depict how the police in this era would attempt to track such a criminal - it was based on a real serial killer.  And despite the Dateline-style attempts to scare parents into keeping closer watch on their kids, the scene that obliquely suggests Elsie's abduction and murder are extremely chilling.  This isn't really a film that fits easily with our modern tastes, but I liked it a great deal nonetheless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Killers

  The Killers  uses up every noir cliche that had developed by this time - the detective story with flashbacks from Laura , the insurance investigator from Double Indemnity, the seductive femme fatale from Gilda - but somehow manages to feel wholly original. I thought that I'd grow weary of noirs by this point, but they are getting better, and there's no doubt that it's a fun genre, if there's not always much going under the pristine surface. There's some tremendous acting, and I unabashedly love the opening scene with the titular killers - the only part that seems to have been actually adapted from the Hemingway short story (Ernest himself was nevertheless a fan) - but the ending doesn't really work. It's a bit easier to follow than The Big Sleep, but it has a few too many twists for what is ultimately a pretty straightforward story without any real morals. Still, I have to recommend it, and it would definitely be up there in my list of best noirs.

Fétiche Mascotte (The Mascot)

Director: Ladislas Starevich Year: 1933 Run-time: 26 min Source: Youtube Notable For : The second animated short on the list from 1933 is this stop-motion piece from the Polish-Russian film-maker Ladislas Starevich.  Stop-motion is almost as old as cinema itself (Starevich had been innovating since 1912).  The craft here is as good as any modern film, and Starevich's twisted imagination is on full display, with dolls and household objects coming to life in a dark version of Toy Story.  For animation fans, it almost goes without saying that Starevich was an influence on Jan Svankmajer's work much later. Verdict :  Every frame is a bizarre delight. There didn't seem to be an overarching plan to this work (indeed, it's possible that The Mascot  is an amalgamation of several shorter films featuring the same dog character), and so the film veers from one strange scene to the next, with much of the second half taking place in some kind of tchotchke hell governe...

A Trip to the Moon

Director: Georges Méliès Year: 1902 Seeing the painstakingly restored hand-colored print of A Trip to the Moon, in a literally mind-numbing 14 frames per second, makes it utterly clear that cinema is and has always been witchcraft. Every frame of this short feels bursting with magic, and even watching it on a modern TV in a space age that would have blown the mind of any of the actors of this film, you're left thinking "How did they do that?".